Friday, March 10, 2006

Who's bigger?

Pixies or Wilco? Go.

5 Comments:

Blogger sbma44 said...

I vote Pixies. Certainly more influential, and they're still currently on an upswing (or at the top of a bubble), whereas Wilco's fortunes have been on the decline since YHF.

5:08 PM  
Blogger Stanley said...

The Pixies are bigger in terms of body of work (I'm guessing, being too lazy to check amazon), fanbase (again, a guess), and historical influence; however, in ten years, Wilco may have overcome the Pixies.

5:28 PM  
Blogger Ryan said...

Actually, Wilco is bigger in body of work, Stanley. The Pixies have done a lot of not releasing anything new for a long time, so while they have definitly been around longer, they don't have a bigger body of work. (But their lead singer is kinda big.)

Fanbase is hard to say. Wilco is pretty popular right now. So are the Pixies. They both play Charlottesville, so that's saying something.

Historical influence goes to the Pixies, but does that really have anything to do with bigness? Conversely, can you be a huge band and not have any historical influence?

11:50 AM  
Blogger Lincoln Michel said...

Frank Black is defintily fatter than anyone in Wilco.

12:41 PM  
Blogger Stanley said...

Some people say the Nice Jenkins can be described as a "huge band and not have any historical influence."

I sort of bristle at the "huge" part, though.

4:59 PM  

Post a Comment

<< Home